#source/youtube#human-behaviorism#robert-sapolsky
indivual difference
kamu bisa bilang, you have that brain, makae kamu act so violently (misal dia gapunya frontal cortex). well pertama ini nge detach dari consciousness, dari sense of self, dari ‘dia’ dan nempelin behaviour ke penyakitnya, and thats a whole topic. but first, disini kamu ngeliat ‘someone act a certain way because of their physical things, dna, ngarah ke hormone, ngarah ke brain, etc’. ini berlaku juga buat semua tindakan. he act a certain way because of his body is like that. ntah itu killing someone, or simply being a jerk, or being nice. ada juga huntingtons diseases, yg nyerang motor badan. but before that, it attack frontal cortex. ada juga tourette disease.
bisa dibilang, all of this disease, in it’s milder form, is individual difference(ya kebalikan e juga, wilder form of individual difference - disease)
-
lol look at jerusalem syndrome
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_syndrome -
stendhal disease (ini yang tics)
-
rapunzel syndrome
many disease gaisa dijelasin pake kek laine, gaisa pake oh waktu masih kecil gini gitu, oh hormone mu gini gitu, oh gene mu gini gitu.
penekanan yang berusaha dikasi sama profesor robert sapolsky adalah, setiap kali kamu ngeliat orang do something, it’s not them with their disease, it’s our differences. kita semua sama2 manusia yang punya perbedaan, dan apapun itu yang mereka miliki ato mereka lakukan, itu ya ke unik an ato trait apalah yang mereka miliki, just like me with my own.
what if at some point, kita ngelabel i semua hal. ada kek jutaan ato miliaran syndrome. and everyone of us have some label attached to us, ato kita semua punya label to describe us fully. then, dimana ‘aku’? kalo semuanya bisa dijelasin pake biologi, ‘oh this because of that’. no free-will?
first acknowledgement. i don’t have ocd, but i have part of ocd. i don’t have <insert disease>, but i have part of it. kita semua have this disease. we have certain level of every disease.
this question challenge one of the ‘pretenses that we all, virtually all, desperately cherish, that we are utterly unique’. ini yang dilempar sama profnya, aku lebih mikir tentang free will, but maybe it’s the same object viewed from difference angle.
(mungkin) jembatan antara unik dan free will
if im not unique, then whatever i do has no meaning.
if there is no free will, then whatever i do has no meaning.
if i have freewill, then i would be unique.
prof argument to not worry about those.
just because we can explain everything, it doesn’t remove the wonder of it. just because we can remove it’s complexity, doesn’t mean it loses its power.
aku gk terlalu paham, tapi kalo aku analogiin sama everything else, just because i know how my phone works internally, how my alarm clock works, it doesn’t mean it loses its … meaning? power? beauty? i dono
second reason.
we will never beable to explain everything. 1 question generate 10 other, it’s a fractal. haldane says ‘life is not only stranger than we imagine, life is stranger than we can imagine’.
i don’t quiet understand apa hubungane, but i agree that it’s a beautiful quite.
the purpose of science is not cure of a sense of mystery, the purpose of science is to constanly reinvent it. beautiful quote by profesor robert sapolsky
what to do with society.
with this knowledge, hopefully we can extend our umbrella of protection, a realm of empathy.
when we describe someone as healthy, it means we merely have the same diseases that everybody else does.
hopefully this comes compassion.
itu yang di lempar sama dosen e. cara kasar e mungkin, no free will, you can forgive someone more easily, lebih isa tolerance.
actually yang kita lempar itu doesn’t ’ oh this cause this’,tapi yang kita lempar itu modulation. nothing start a behaviour, everything is modulating. so you could never figure out how stuff is actually working.
lesson general from professor Robert Sapolsky
when you have to say yes to something, you are de facto saying no to other 20 other things. and some of those other thing is very very important to you, and those are though choices to make. it’s gonna be hard, but you guys have to do it.
you don’t have to choose between being compassionate and being scientific. so go and do both.
(i don’t understand how)